Elo Development

Series History

Hover with the mouse to show details.

ar iDabs

1930 ±0 1930

0

vs.

0

47% - Prediction - 53%

Show Details

mx themariach1

1952 ±0 1952

The result was exactly like expected, so no Elo changes.

mx GuKi

2006 ±0 2006

0

vs.

0

61% - Prediction - 39%

Show Details

ar iDabs

1930 ±0 1930

The result was exactly like expected, so no Elo changes.

ar iDabs

1930 ±0 1930

0

vs.

0

13% - Prediction - 87%

Show Details

br dogao

2254 ±0 2254

The result was exactly like expected, so no Elo changes.

ro Mihai06

2233 ±0 2233

0

vs.

0

85% - Prediction - 15%

Show Details

ar iDabs

1930 ±0 1930

The result was exactly like expected, so no Elo changes.

mx Uzzi

2085 +4 2089

+2+2

2

vs.

0

70% - Prediction - 30%

Show Details

ar iDabs

1934 −4 1930

−2−2

tw Rayz

1939 +4 1943

+4+4−4

2

vs.

1

50% - Prediction - 50%

Show Details

ar iDabs

1938 −4 1934

−4−4+4

ar VarVarus

1986 ±0 1986

0

vs.

0

57% - Prediction - 43%

Show Details

ar iDabs

1938 ±0 1938

The result was exactly like expected, so no Elo changes.

ar Monoz

1994 +6 2000

+3+3

2

vs.

0

57% - Prediction - 43%

Show Details

ar iDabs

1944 −6 1938

−3−3

ar Twigg

2080 +6 2086

+3+3

2

vs.

0

68% - Prediction - 32%

Show Details

ar iDabs

1950 −6 1944

−3−3

ar iDabs

1949 +1 1950

+3+3−5

2

vs.

1

57% - Prediction - 43%

Show Details

pe El Sí De Las Niñas

1900 −1 1899

−3−3+5

ar iDabs

1949 ±0 1949

0

vs.

0

47% - Prediction - 53%

Show Details

ar Rodrixs

1969 ±0 1969

The result was exactly like expected, so no Elo changes.

uy Sebastian2002

2235 +2 2237

+1+1

2

vs.

0

84% - Prediction - 16%

Show Details

ar iDabs

1951 −2 1949

−1−1

ar _BL4CK_

2027 ±0 2027

0

vs.

0

61% - Prediction - 39%

Show Details

ar iDabs

1951 ±0 1951

The result was exactly like expected, so no Elo changes.

mx Eren

1944 ±0 1944

0

vs.

0

49% - Prediction - 51%

Show Details

ar iDabs

1951 ±0 1951

The result was exactly like expected, so no Elo changes.

de Nili

2068 ±0 2068

0

vs.

0

66% - Prediction - 34%

Show Details

ar iDabs

1951 ±0 1951

The result was exactly like expected, so no Elo changes.

ar Tatengue

1907 +7 1914

+5+5−3

2

vs.

1

43% - Prediction - 57%

Show Details

ar iDabs

1958 −7 1951

−5−5+3

ar iDabs

1968 −10 1958

−5−5

0

vs.

2

60% - Prediction - 40%

Show Details

ar Tatengue

1896 +10 1906

+5+5

ar iDabs

1968 ±0 1968

0

vs.

0

51% - Prediction - 49%

Show Details

cl Whocl

1959 ±0 1959

The result was exactly like expected, so no Elo changes.

ar Tatengue

1898 +10 1908

+5+5

2

vs.

0

39% - Prediction - 61%

Show Details

ar iDabs

1978 −10 1968

−5−5

tw Sora Kuma

2083 +6 2089

+3+3

2

vs.

0

64% - Prediction - 36%

Show Details

ar iDabs

1984 −6 1978

−3−3

tw z40305125

1995 +8 2003

+4+4

2

vs.

0

50% - Prediction - 50%

Show Details

ar iDabs

1992 −8 1984

−4−4

de Nili

2053 ±0 2053

0

vs.

0

59% - Prediction - 41%

Show Details

ar iDabs

1992 ±0 1992

The result was exactly like expected, so no Elo changes.

ar prisma09

1963 +8 1971

+4+4

2

vs.

0

45% - Prediction - 55%

Show Details

ar iDabs

2000 −8 1992

−4−4

vn BacT

2146 −2 2144

+2+2−6

2

vs.

1

70% - Prediction - 30%

Show Details

ar iDabs

1998 +2 2000

−2−2+6

BacT still lost points to iDabs, because the victory was closer than expected.

es TaToH

2351 +2 2353

+1+1

2

vs.

0

88% - Prediction - 12%

Show Details

ar iDabs

2000 −2 1998

−1−1

Most Frequent Opponents
ar Tatengue3x0x won (0%)Compare...
de Nili2x0x won (0%)Compare...
es TaToH1x0x won (0%)Compare...
vn BacT1x0x won (0%)Compare...
mx themariach11x0x won (0%)Compare...